Loading...
ODLA Intelligence Agent
ODLA reads company accounts, cross-checks public insolvency records, and surfaces overdrawn director-loan situations as scored, sourced leads.
From public record to compliant instruction - in eight steps
The full platform automates the research and surfaces only the strongest candidates, so your team focuses where it matters most.
We continuously scan every active UK company at Companies House.
We focus on smaller companies with two or more directors showing signs of financial pressure - the situations where a director-loan problem is most likely.
Our AI reads each company's published accounts, including the notes, to spot signs of money owed by directors - even when it isn't spelled out.
We add director history, insolvency notices from The Gazette, and registered charges to build a complete picture.
Each company gets a transparent 0–100 score showing how strong and actionable the opportunity is, with the reasoning behind every number.
We generate a plain-English brief - like the examples below - with a source link for every claim.
Your team reviews each brief in a simple workflow. Nothing is ever sent to a company automatically - a person always approves first.
Approved leads become a careful, compliant invitation to discuss - never an accusation.
Every output is an internal assessment requiring human verification. We avoid any language asserting wrongdoing.
Intelligence briefs - pre-generated from public records
Each brief below was produced by the ODLA engine from publicly available filings. The composite score and reasoning are fully auditable.
Generated 30 May 2026
Live preview score. The full pipeline adds director cross-checks and web contact discovery before creating a tiered lead.
LLM confidence: medium
LLM est. £6,602,900
No stress flags
Gazette: 2443, 2441, 2450
CH status: voluntary-arrangement
Not assessed in live mode (real pipeline cross-checks directorships)
2 director(s)
Registered office only (live mode does not run web discovery)
The accounts disclose 'Other debtors' of £6,602,900 and include a specific note for 'Directors' transactions'. The company is currently in a CVA and has multiple directors, which may indicate potential ODLA exposure within the other debtors balance.
Source Extracts
“Other debtors”
“Directors' transactions”
“The company remains in a CVA”
Anomalies
Debtors
£406,964
NetAssets
£5,238,229
OtherDebtors
£66,029
PrepaymentsAccruedIncome
£197,432
Heuristic Indicators
Other Debtors Ratio
1.3%
Negative Reserves
No
Net Liabilities
No
Internal intelligence assessment - requires human verification before any external contact. Indicators are drawn from public records and may require confirmation.
CONFIDENTIAL DIRECTOR EXPOSURE NOTICE
Company Number: 01267980
Prepared For
Paul Schwartz
Director appointed: 31 March 2008
John Stephen Tasker
Previous Director Intelligence Identified
Michael Garner
Director appointed: 31 December 1991
Director resigned: 4 July 2003
Karen Louise Tasker
Director appointed: 4 July 2003
Director resigned: 16 April 2024
Peter Andrew Tasker
Director resigned: 31 December 1991
Estimated Potential Director Exposure Identified
£6,602,900+
Potentially reducible to between £660,290 and £3,301,450 subject to suitability, timing, solvency position and structured settlement review.
Our review of the publicly available financial, insolvency and director intelligence relating to TASKERS LIMITED and its associated officers has identified multiple indicators commonly associated with increasing insolvency pressure and potential director-related balance sheet exposure.
The intelligence reviewed included:
Based upon the presently available information, the identified exposure may exceed £6,602,900+ and may become recoverable personally against the relevant director(s) in the event of a future liquidation, administration or other formal insolvency procedure.
Our intelligence review identified the following indicators presently associated with TASKERS LIMITED:
The presently disclosed balance sheet structure appears consistent with positions frequently encountered prior to formal insolvency escalation and subsequent office-holder investigation.
Where a company subsequently enters liquidation or another formal insolvency process, any overdrawn director loan account or related director balance sheet exposure may become recoverable personally by an appointed insolvency office-holder acting for creditors.
In practical terms, this may expose directors to:
Importantly, once a formal insolvency event occurs, directors frequently lose the ability to control timing, commercial negotiation, settlement structure and strategic resolution options.
Timing is often critical.
Insolvency & Law Ltd specialises in advising companies and directors in relation to overdrawn director loan account exposure, pre-insolvency exposure mitigation, negotiated compromise strategies, assignment and settlement structures and strategic balance sheet resolution arrangements.
Subject to review, verification and suitability, it is often possible to structure negotiated commercial outcomes which reduce practical financial exposure materially below the apparent face-value position.
In appropriate cases, reductions of between 50% and 90% of the apparent exposure have been achieved through early-stage intervention and negotiated commercial resolution strategies.
The currently indicated early resolution range is: Potentially reducible to between £660,290 and £3,301,450 subject to suitability, timing, solvency position and structured settlement review.
The availability and extent of any reduction depends upon the underlying accounting position, solvency profile, creditor landscape, director conduct, timing and overall commercial circumstances.
The intelligence indicators identified within this report may also become relevant to HMRC, creditors, insolvency practitioners, litigation funders, professional negligence advisers and future office-holders.
This may be relevant in circumstances where the company subsequently enters formal insolvency proceedings and questions later arise regarding solvency position, director conduct, creditor treatment, related-party balances or the timing of director decision-making.
Accordingly, early confidential review and strategic assessment may be commercially prudent before events progress further.
This notice has been prepared because the presently available public-record intelligence suggests that proactive intervention may materially improve the available commercial resolution options.
Directors frequently seek advice only after HMRC escalation, creditor action, winding-up threats or insolvency proceedings, by which stage many strategic options may already have narrowed significantly.
This notice is intended solely as a confidential invitation to discuss the position further.
No allegation of wrongdoing is made or implied.
The contents are based solely upon publicly available information and have not been verified against the company's internal accounting records.
Any proposed strategy would remain subject to accounting review, legal review, tax analysis, insolvency assessment, verification of records and formal commercial agreement.
Peter Murray
Insolvency & Law Ltd
78 York Street, London W1H 1DP
Email: peter.murray@insolvencyandlaw.co.uk
Tel: 020 7504 1300
STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
This report contains confidential commercial intelligence prepared solely for the intended recipient. It must not be copied, distributed or disclosed without the prior written consent of Insolvency & Law Ltd.
Showcase-only sequence. No email is sent from this demo.
1. Initial outbound email
Day 0
Subject: Confidential director exposure notice - TASKERS LIMITED
Dear Paul Schwartz, Please find attached a strictly private and confidential Director Exposure Notice prepared from publicly available information relating to TASKERS LIMITED. The attached notice identifies estimated potential director exposure of £6,602,900+. No allegation of wrongdoing is made or implied. The contents have not been verified against the company's internal accounting records and any strategy would remain subject to accounting, legal, tax and insolvency review. If this is a matter you would like to discuss confidentially, Peter Murray would be pleased to arrange a brief introductory conversation. Yours faithfully, Insolvency & Law Ltd
2. First no-response follow-up
After 5 business days if no response
Subject: Follow-up: confidential director exposure review - TASKERS LIMITED
Dear Paul Schwartz, I am following up on the confidential Director Exposure Notice sent in relation to TASKERS LIMITED. In summary, the public-record review identified potential director loan account exposure identified from public filings, debtor balances materially disproportionate to net asset position and creditor-pressure characteristics. The purpose of the notice is to invite a confidential discussion before any creditor escalation or formal insolvency appointment narrows the available commercial options. If you would like Peter Murray to review the position, please reply with a suitable time for a short call. Yours faithfully, Insolvency & Law Ltd
3. Final no-response follow-up
After 10 business days if no response
Subject: Final follow-up: TASKERS LIMITED
Dear Paul Schwartz, This is a final follow-up regarding the confidential director exposure review previously provided. The matter may not require action, but early review can preserve more strategic flexibility than later-stage engagement following creditor escalation, winding-up threats or insolvency appointment. If you do not wish to discuss the position, no further automated follow-up will be sent as part of this sequence. Yours faithfully, Insolvency & Law Ltd
Response rule: If any director responds, the no-response sequence is paused immediately and routed for human review.
Stop rule: Automated follow-up stops when a response is received, the lead is suppressed, or a reviewer changes the outreach status.
Next course: Once a response is received, the workflow may take a different course or stop altogether depending on the substance of the response and reviewer assessment.
Internal use only. All outputs are preliminary assessments based on public records and require human verification before any external action. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice or an assertion of wrongdoing.